January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
May 2007
June 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006

Barbarian Diordieva - the lawyer, an analyst.
If you had legal issues, the problems connected with realisation of your rights, and also the questions, concerning legislations, write.
Setting questions, specify region (Ukraine, Russia etc.).
However about one of the inadequate installations connected with money, we will talk today here and now. Its aphoristic expression though belongs to Charles Marx, but to our people is more known thanking Остапу Бендеру, marked off its dark blue pencil in the book "Shark of world imperialism", the sent parcel post to Alexander Korejko.
Have recollected?
"All large modern conditions are acquired by the most disgraceful by"
Корейко was the person uncommon. Instantly multiplied and divided in mind the big three-value and four-unit numbers. He resembled the boxer, is prudent подготовляющего the triumph. He submitted to a special mode, did not drink and did not smoke, supported the form, being engaged with heavy weights. Alexander Ivanovich wished to be young and fresh that day when all will come back to old, and it can leave an underground, fearlessly having opened ordinary чемоданишко. That the old will return, Корейко never doubted. He took care for capitalism.
Judging by that those far years to Alexander Ivanovichu was already thirty eight, capitalism he, most likely, has not waited.
We have waited.
However installations of people are replaced much more slowly, than economic formations.
According to interrogations of sociologists, more than 80 % of the interrogated inhabitants of Russia consider, that the riches and honesty are incompatible. On a question from the capitalist world "If you such clever why such poor", our people have thought up plunging capitalists in surprise the answer: "That is why that the fair!"
Ask people and why they so think, and they hardly can answer you something except "well, same all know". And the most advance even will result in the answer the citation from Charles Marx which has forced Alexander Ivanovicha to be twisted for horror.
What for Ilf and Petrov moved Marx's installations to weights - clearly. Time such was. And to you now it what for?
It is assured, whether that if sociologists will ask a question "you Wish to be rich?", the majority of respondents will answer "Yes". By the way, you too want? And at the same time more than 80 % of people are assured, that the riches and honesty are incompatible. By the way, you too are assured?
If you have answered both questions "yes", that, obviously, you are going to reach riches disgraceful by?
If is not present, to you it is yet obvious, what "the riches and honesty are incompatible with installation" and to remain fair it is impossible to become desire rich?
In general, what such money?
It is heavy to person to exist separately from other people, not using fruits of their work. I.e. exist it can (see, for example, of R.Kipling "Маугли" or V.Megre "Anastas"), but it is sick (at my subjective sight) некомфортно. To make a life of more comfortable, people began to use a division of labour - one does one, another - another. Then exchange results. You to me a goat - I to you a boat.
But barter was not too convenient also people have thought up money. Money is an equivalent of cost of the goods and services. I will remind - the goods and services are fruits of work of the people, that advantage which they can bring to other members of a society.
Money is an indicator of that advantage which you bring to other people.
Here so.
Money which you have received for the work on advantage of other people, two things reflect:
How much that you do, actually is necessary for other people (here many different components - for example, how much your work is unique and irreplaceable etc.)
How much you are able to present, sell results of the work to other people.
However to a society you can bring advantage not only personally own work, but also money earlier earned by you in itself. I now speak about investment. Investing free savings, you for a while transfer your money to business which uses them for reception of profit by manufacture of the necessary goods or rendering of useful services.
Advantage of it all:
And to business which has an opportunity to increase scales and to earn additional profit
And to a society receiving the new goods and services
And to you, in the form of the additional passive income for which it is not necessary to work - percent, dividends, etc.
It is interesting, that your money, being correctly and with mind are invested, the income, than own labour activity can in due course start to bring to you much more больший.
However to invest money correctly and with mind, and really to receive this passive income (instead of to lose them in the next financial adventure), financial literacy is necessary.
Problem of the majority of our fellow citizens that they have no this financial literacy. In it do not train at schools and institutes. Despite an abundance of books on book counters, I cannot recommend any of them as the good textbook that investments and as the financial markets actually work actually are. Robert Kijosaki's same books from a series "the Rich daddy, the poor daddy" which have cleared at many interest to investment (and which I recommend to read necessarily if you still have not made till now it), have more likely motivating character, than are an explanation of "game rules".